Triple

T7486370
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce E176891 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce E176891 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce | Statement: [Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, fullName, Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce
Context triple: [Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, fullName, Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce]
  • A. Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce chosen
    Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce was a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld restrictions on corporate independent political expenditures under the First Amendment until it was later overturned by Citizens United.
  • B. Austin v. United States
    Austin v. United States is a 1993 U.S. Supreme Court case that held certain civil forfeitures constitute punishment and are therefore subject to the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause.
  • C. Michigan v. Tucker
    Michigan v. Tucker is a 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the exclusionary rule’s application to statements obtained without full Miranda warnings, holding that derivative evidence from such statements could still be admissible.
  • D. Branch v. Texas
    Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
  • E. Alexander v. Sandoval
    Alexander v. Sandoval is a 2001 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held there is no private right of action to enforce disparate-impact regulations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f24ac508190bb98fe927c0bd065 completed March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f556955c8190bf014a065e04c5d8 completed March 27, 2026, 9:23 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c83c68bcf081908a2c280152d887f0 completed March 28, 2026, 8:39 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:42 p.m.