Triple
T7486074
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ronald H. Bradley et al. |
E176884
|
entity |
| Predicate | initiatedProceedingsIn |
P3010
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federal district court |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal district court | Statement: [Ronald H. Bradley et al., initiatedProceedingsIn, federal district court]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: initiatedProceedingsIn Context triple: [Ronald H. Bradley et al., initiatedProceedingsIn, federal district court]
-
A.
hasLegalProceeding
chosen
Indicates that there is a formal legal action, case, or proceeding involving the related entities.
-
B.
typeOfProceedings
Indicates the specific category or kind of legal or formal process under which an action or case is being conducted.
-
C.
legalProcedureUsed
Indicates that a particular legal procedure or process is applied or employed in relation to a case, action, or legal matter.
-
D.
relatedLegalProcess
Indicates that there is an associated legal proceeding or action that is connected to, arises from, or is otherwise relevant to the referenced entity or event.
-
E.
prosecuted
Indicates that legal authorities have formally brought criminal charges against an entity and pursued a case against them in a court of law.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f24ac508190bb98fe927c0bd065 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f556955c8190bf014a065e04c5d8 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f03eeaa88190a5215772ed05ee9f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:42 p.m.