Triple
T7476659
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Charles T. Schenck |
E176647
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNotableCourtDecisionAbout |
P21812
|
FINISHED |
| Object | limits on free speech during wartime |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: limits on free speech during wartime | Statement: [Charles T. Schenck, hasNotableCourtDecisionAbout, limits on free speech during wartime]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotableCourtDecisionAbout Context triple: [Charles T. Schenck, hasNotableCourtDecisionAbout, limits on free speech during wartime]
-
A.
hasNotableDecision
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific decision that is considered significant or noteworthy in some context.
-
B.
hasLowerCourtDecision
Indicates that a higher court case is associated with, or results from, a specific decision made by a lower court.
-
C.
hasNotableJudge
Indicates that an entity is associated with a judge who is distinguished, prominent, or otherwise notable in some recognized way.
-
D.
influencedCourtDecision
Indicates that one entity had an effect on or contributed to the outcome of a court’s decision regarding another entity or matter.
-
E.
notableSupremeCourtCase
Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f236ce08190a04d7679f03b29b2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f4ee23d081908e05658a651661fc |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f03d967081908a8e696ff9693b90 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:41 p.m.