Triple
T7476541
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Noerr-Pennington doctrine |
E176644
|
entity |
| Predicate | shamExceptionDefinition |
P13260
|
FINISHED |
| Object | petitioning that is objectively baseless and subjectively intended to interfere directly with a competitor through governmental process rather than outcome |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: petitioning that is objectively baseless and subjectively intended to interfere directly with a competitor through governmental process rather than outcome | Statement: [Noerr-Pennington doctrine, shamExceptionDefinition, petitioning that is objectively baseless and subjectively intended to interfere directly with a competitor through governmental process rather than outcome]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: shamExceptionDefinition Context triple: [Noerr-Pennington doctrine, shamExceptionDefinition, petitioning that is objectively baseless and subjectively intended to interfere directly with a competitor through governmental process rather than outcome]
-
A.
throws
Indicates that one entity propels or hurls another entity or object through space, typically by a deliberate physical action.
-
B.
exception
chosen
Indicates that a particular case does not follow the usual rule, pattern, or condition that applies to others.
-
C.
exceptionToOaths
Indicates that a situation, condition, or rule provides a valid exception to an otherwise binding oath or sworn obligation.
-
D.
eraDefinition
Indicates the specific time period or historical era during which something is defined, classified, or considered valid.
-
E.
doesNotProvideExceptionFor
Indicates that one party or rule fails to grant an exemption, special case, or exclusion to another party or situation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f236ce08190a04d7679f03b29b2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f4ee23d081908e05658a651661fc |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f03d967081908a8e696ff9693b90 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:41 p.m.