Triple

T7476426
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited E176642 entity
Predicate concurrenceType P76467 FINISHED
Object concurring in the result LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: concurring in the result | Statement: [California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, concurrenceType, concurring in the result]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: concurrenceType
Context triple: [California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, concurrenceType, concurring in the result]
  • A. cooperationType
    Indicates the specific kind or form of cooperative relationship that exists between the related entities.
  • B. canConcurIn
    Indicates that one entity is able or permitted to agree with, coincide with, or participate jointly in the same event, decision, or condition as another entity.
  • C. conclusionType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of conclusion associated with an argument, inference, or reasoning process.
  • D. convenedFor
    Indicates that an event, meeting, or gathering was brought together for a specific purpose, topic, or beneficiary.
  • E. conflictType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of conflict that characterizes the relationship or interaction between entities.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f236ce08190a04d7679f03b29b2 completed March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f4ee23d081908e05658a651661fc completed March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6f03d967081908a8e696ff9693b90 completed March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6f105e320819091db3cdb1f1351f0 completed March 27, 2026, 9:05 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:41 p.m.