Triple
T7476180
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hague v. CIO |
E176637
|
entity |
| Predicate | appliedToStates |
P1129
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yes | Statement: [Hague v. CIO, appliedToStates, Yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appliedToStates Context triple: [Hague v. CIO, appliedToStates, Yes]
-
A.
appliedToStatesThrough
Indicates that something (such as a rule, policy, or process) is implemented or enforced by means of, or via the mediation of, particular states.
-
B.
appliesTo
chosen
Indicates that something is relevant, valid, or has effect in relation to a particular entity, case, or context.
-
C.
appliesToPresentDayStates
Indicates that the relationship, rule, or condition is relevant to and valid for states as they exist in the present day.
-
D.
appliedToStatesOrFederal
Indicates that something (such as a rule, policy, or action) is applicable to either state-level entities, the federal level, or both.
-
E.
appliesAlsoTo
Indicates that a condition, rule, or characteristic that applies to one entity is additionally applicable to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f236ce08190a04d7679f03b29b2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f4ee23d081908e05658a651661fc |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f03d967081908a8e696ff9693b90 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:41 p.m.