Triple

T7476009
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject De Jonge v. Oregon E176633 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Hague v. CIO E176637 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hague v. CIO | Statement: [De Jonge v. Oregon, relatedCase, Hague v. CIO]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hague v. CIO
Context triple: [De Jonge v. Oregon, relatedCase, Hague v. CIO]
  • A. Hague v. CIO chosen
    Hague v. CIO is a 1939 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly shaped First Amendment jurisprudence by affirming protections for public assembly and speech in public forums.
  • B. United Public Workers v. Mitchell
    United Public Workers v. Mitchell is a 1947 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Hatch Act’s restrictions on federal employees’ political activities.
  • C. Hudgens v. NLRB
    Hudgens v. NLRB is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Burger Court held that the First Amendment does not guarantee union organizers the right to picket on privately owned shopping center property.
  • D. Janus v. AFSCME
    Janus v. AFSCME is a landmark 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held public-sector unions cannot require nonmembers to pay agency fees, significantly weakening union funding and power.
  • E. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
    Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f236ce08190a04d7679f03b29b2 completed March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f41951348190a740b3957a73f825 completed March 27, 2026, 9:18 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c83489a8208190b0380edcd18a1246 completed March 28, 2026, 8:05 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:41 p.m.