Triple

T7475983
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject De Jonge v. Oregon E176633 entity
Predicate priorHistory P3444 FINISHED
Object State v. De Jonge, 152 Or. 315, 53 P.2d 1078 (1936) E176633 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: State v. De Jonge, 152 Or. 315, 53 P.2d 1078 (1936) | Statement: [De Jonge v. Oregon, priorHistory, State v. De Jonge, 152 Or. 315, 53 P.2d 1078 (1936)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: State v. De Jonge, 152 Or. 315, 53 P.2d 1078 (1936)
Context triple: [De Jonge v. Oregon, priorHistory, State v. De Jonge, 152 Or. 315, 53 P.2d 1078 (1936)]
  • A. De Jonge v. Oregon chosen
    De Jonge v. Oregon is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the right to peaceful assembly is a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and thus applies to the states.
  • B. Oregon v. Elstad
    Oregon v. Elstad is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that a suspect’s later, properly Mirandized confession can be admissible even if an earlier unwarned statement was obtained in violation of Miranda.
  • C. Oregon Compiled Laws Annotated
    Oregon Compiled Laws Annotated was a former codification of Oregon’s general statutes, organized and annotated for legal reference before being superseded by the Oregon Revised Statutes.
  • D. Oregon Department of Justice
    The Oregon Department of Justice is the statewide legal and law enforcement agency that provides legal counsel, civil and criminal enforcement, and consumer protection services for the state of Oregon.
  • E. State of Oregon in Multnomah County criminal cases
    The State of Oregon in Multnomah County criminal cases is the governmental prosecuting party on whose behalf the Multnomah County District Attorney brings and litigates criminal charges.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f236ce08190a04d7679f03b29b2 completed March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f41951348190a740b3957a73f825 completed March 27, 2026, 9:18 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c83489a8208190b0380edcd18a1246 completed March 28, 2026, 8:05 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:41 p.m.