Triple
T7475983
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | De Jonge v. Oregon |
E176633
|
entity |
| Predicate | priorHistory |
P3444
|
FINISHED |
| Object | State v. De Jonge, 152 Or. 315, 53 P.2d 1078 (1936) |
E176633
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: State v. De Jonge, 152 Or. 315, 53 P.2d 1078 (1936) | Statement: [De Jonge v. Oregon, priorHistory, State v. De Jonge, 152 Or. 315, 53 P.2d 1078 (1936)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: State v. De Jonge, 152 Or. 315, 53 P.2d 1078 (1936) Context triple: [De Jonge v. Oregon, priorHistory, State v. De Jonge, 152 Or. 315, 53 P.2d 1078 (1936)]
-
A.
De Jonge v. Oregon
chosen
De Jonge v. Oregon is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the right to peaceful assembly is a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and thus applies to the states.
-
B.
Oregon v. Elstad
Oregon v. Elstad is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that a suspect’s later, properly Mirandized confession can be admissible even if an earlier unwarned statement was obtained in violation of Miranda.
-
C.
Oregon Compiled Laws Annotated
Oregon Compiled Laws Annotated was a former codification of Oregon’s general statutes, organized and annotated for legal reference before being superseded by the Oregon Revised Statutes.
-
D.
Oregon Department of Justice
The Oregon Department of Justice is the statewide legal and law enforcement agency that provides legal counsel, civil and criminal enforcement, and consumer protection services for the state of Oregon.
-
E.
State of Oregon in Multnomah County criminal cases
The State of Oregon in Multnomah County criminal cases is the governmental prosecuting party on whose behalf the Multnomah County District Attorney brings and litigates criminal charges.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f236ce08190a04d7679f03b29b2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f41951348190a740b3957a73f825 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:18 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c83489a8208190b0380edcd18a1246 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 8:05 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:41 p.m.