Triple
T7475953
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Slave Trade Clause |
E176632
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalEffect |
P4749
|
FINISHED |
| Object | extended legal protection for the transatlantic slave trade until 1808 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: extended legal protection for the transatlantic slave trade until 1808 | Statement: [Slave Trade Clause, historicalEffect, extended legal protection for the transatlantic slave trade until 1808]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalEffect Context triple: [Slave Trade Clause, historicalEffect, extended legal protection for the transatlantic slave trade until 1808]
-
A.
historicalImpact
chosen
Indicates the influence or lasting effects that an entity, event, or action has had on subsequent history or historical developments.
-
B.
facedHistoricalImpact
Indicates that an entity has experienced or been subjected to a significant influence, consequence, or change resulting from historical events or processes.
-
C.
historicalPower
Indicates that one entity held significant influence, control, or authority over another during a past period.
-
D.
historical
Indicates that the subject has existed, occurred, or been relevant in the past rather than in the present or future.
-
E.
historicalCondition
Indicates that one entity represents a condition, state, or circumstance that applied to another entity at some point in the past.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f236ce08190a04d7679f03b29b2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f41951348190a740b3957a73f825 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f03d967081908a8e696ff9693b90 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:41 p.m.