Triple
T7452788
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | European Arrest Warrant |
E172045
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsSafeguard |
P32681
|
FINISHED |
| Object | protection of fundamental rights |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: protection of fundamental rights | Statement: [European Arrest Warrant, containsSafeguard, protection of fundamental rights]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsSafeguard Context triple: [European Arrest Warrant, containsSafeguard, protection of fundamental rights]
-
A.
safeguard
Indicates taking protective actions to shield someone or something from harm, loss, or danger.
-
B.
safeguardingMeasuresInclude
chosen
Indicates that certain specific protective or security measures are contained within, or form part of, a broader set of safeguarding measures.
-
C.
supportsSafetyChecks
Indicates that an entity provides or enables mechanisms for performing safety checks or validations.
-
D.
hasSecurityClause
Indicates that an agreement, contract, or document includes a provision specifying security-related requirements, protections, or safeguards.
-
E.
securityGuarantee
Indicates a commitment by one party to protect or defend another party against specified threats or risks.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68a66554c8190add75c65942c0317 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f38d6a8c8190af2e73c719da87a6 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f039f7248190bb4183f97b605763 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:14 p.m.