Triple
T7452623
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | European Judicial Network |
E172042
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | judicial cooperation network |
C14105
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: judicial cooperation network Context triple: [European Judicial Network, instanceOf, judicial cooperation network]
-
A.
judicial network
chosen
A judicial network is a structured system of interconnected courts, judges, and legal institutions that interact through case decisions, precedents, and administrative relationships to shape and apply the law.
-
B.
network of national human rights institutions
A network of national human rights institutions is a coordinated system of independent, state-based bodies that collaborate to promote, protect, and strengthen human rights standards and practices domestically and internationally.
-
C.
regional collaborative network
A regional collaborative network is a structured alliance of organizations, institutions, and stakeholders within a specific geographic area that coordinate resources, knowledge, and activities to address shared goals and regional challenges.
-
D.
network of competition authorities
A network of competition authorities is a collaborative framework linking national or regional antitrust agencies to coordinate enforcement, share information, and promote consistent competition policy across jurisdictions.
-
E.
supranational court
A supranational court is a judicial body established by multiple states or international organizations with authority to interpret and apply shared legal norms and issue binding decisions that transcend individual national legal systems.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68a66554c8190add75c65942c0317 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:14 p.m.