Triple

T7448826
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Edward Chamberlayne E171952 entity
Predicate relationshipTypeWithCeliaCoplestone P76975 FINISHED
Object extramarital affair LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: extramarital affair | Statement: [Edward Chamberlayne, relationshipTypeWithCeliaCoplestone, extramarital affair]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWithCeliaCoplestone
Context triple: [Edward Chamberlayne, relationshipTypeWithCeliaCoplestone, extramarital affair]
  • A. relationshipToCatherine
    Indicates the specific familial, social, or interpersonal connection that one entity has to the person named Catherine.
  • B. relationshipToAnneBoleyn
    Indicates the specific familial, marital, or social connection that an entity has to Anne Boleyn.
  • C. relationshipTypeWithLizzieEustace
    Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Lizzie Eustace.
  • D. relationshipTypeWith Alicia Johns
    Indicates the specific type or nature of the relationship that an entity has with Alicia Johns.
  • E. relationshipToSophie
    Indicates the specific type of personal or social connection that an entity has to Sophie.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68a65402881908f7869368eb746fb completed March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f389ddd48190a4b8753c67220c4f completed March 27, 2026, 9:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6f039f7248190bb4183f97b605763 completed March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6f1ee5ab8819091082324f2dc3b8c completed March 27, 2026, 9:09 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:14 p.m.