Triple

T7441066
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ganymede E171752 entity
Predicate orbitalResonanceRatioWithIo P17319 FINISHED
Object 1:4 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1:4 | Statement: [Ganymede, orbitalResonanceRatioWithIo, 1:4]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: orbitalResonanceRatioWithIo
Context triple: [Ganymede, orbitalResonanceRatioWithIo, 1:4]
  • A. hasOrbitalResonanceWith chosen
    Indicates that two orbiting bodies have orbital periods in a simple integer ratio, causing their gravitational influences to repeat in a regular, synchronized pattern.
  • B. hasTisserandParameterWithRespectToJupiter
    Indicates that an object has a specific value of the Tisserand parameter measured with respect to Jupiter, characterizing its dynamical relationship and orbital interaction with Jupiter.
  • C. radiusRelativeToJupiter
    Indicates that the radius of one object is expressed as a value relative to the radius of Jupiter.
  • D. massInJupiterOrbit
    Indicates the mass an object has while it is located in orbit around Jupiter.
  • E. hasOrbitalPeriod
    Indicates that one entity completes a full orbit around another entity within a specified duration.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68a64228c8190affaec2a8127ce7b completed March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f34d84008190936af2b3670ef210 completed March 27, 2026, 9:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6f038582c8190bac77c9b5a34b862 completed March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:13 p.m.