Triple
T7439910
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Forsmark nuclear power plant |
E171719
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedNear |
P294
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Östhammar |
E171719
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Östhammar | Statement: [Forsmark nuclear power plant, locatedNear, Östhammar]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Östhammar Context triple: [Forsmark nuclear power plant, locatedNear, Östhammar]
-
A.
Östhammar
chosen
Östhammar is a small coastal town and municipality in eastern Sweden known for its archipelago, historic wooden buildings, and proximity to the Forsmark nuclear power plant.
-
B.
Fredrikshamn
Fredrikshamn (Hamina) is a coastal town in southeastern Finland that historically served as an important military and trading center.
-
C.
Östervåla
Östervåla is a locality in central Sweden that serves as one of the settlements within Heby Municipality in Uppsala County.
-
D.
Svalöv
Svalöv is a small locality and municipality in Skåne County in southern Sweden, known for its rural landscape and agricultural surroundings.
-
E.
Bollstanäs
Bollstanäs is a residential locality in Sweden situated within the suburban area of Upplands Väsby, north of Stockholm.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68a64228c8190affaec2a8127ce7b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f34c28648190a426b5d7623b41e8 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:14 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c8344d4c408190a72f8f7718957f21 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 8:04 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:13 p.m.