Triple
T742191
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Holocene |
E15266
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasFormalStatus |
P18869
|
FINISHED |
| Object | formal chronostratigraphic unit |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: formal chronostratigraphic unit | Statement: [Holocene, hasFormalStatus, formal chronostratigraphic unit]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFormalStatus Context triple: [Holocene, hasFormalStatus, formal chronostratigraphic unit]
-
A.
hasInformalStatus
Indicates that an entity holds a non-official, casual, or unofficial standing or role in relation to another entity.
-
B.
hasLegalStatus
Indicates that an entity possesses a particular legal classification, recognition, or standing under law.
-
C.
isFormalizedBy
Indicates that something is given a defined, structured, or official form through a specific method, process, or representation.
-
D.
areOfficialIn
Indicates that an entity holds an official role, position, or capacity within another entity (such as an organization, institution, or jurisdiction).
-
E.
hasInfluentialStatus
Indicates that an entity holds a position, role, or condition that gives it significant influence or impact over others or over outcomes.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49358aa308190adbc9b5a0a2adcf9 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a60e286c81908787a41cf9b9f150 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4a4fdaaf48190985f62acfc069508 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4a5a35c68819082429755c046e9a7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:46 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.