Triple

T7421591
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kettlewell E171260 entity
Predicate themeInvolving P22147 FINISHED
Object disruptive innovation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: disruptive innovation | Statement: [Kettlewell, themeInvolving, disruptive innovation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: themeInvolving
Context triple: [Kettlewell, themeInvolving, disruptive innovation]
  • A. themeFor
    Indicates that something serves as the central subject, topic, or focus for another thing (such as an event, work, or activity).
  • B. themeInspiration
    Indicates that one entity serves as the creative source or conceptual basis that inspires or shapes the theme expressed in another entity.
  • C. theme
    Indicates the entity that is the primary participant or content affected or characterized by an action, event, or state.
  • D. themeInvolvingCharacter
    Indicates that a theme, motif, or abstract concept centrally involves or is significantly shaped by a particular character.
  • E. followsInTheme chosen
    Indicates that one element continues or succeeds another while maintaining the same theme or thematic context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68a625d048190af70eb8b63bec5a0 completed March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f2ebc520819087cfc2eb9dda0e17 completed March 27, 2026, 9:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6f03648d08190b862d07fef71210c completed March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:11 p.m.