Triple

T740110
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana E15223 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Toomer v. Witsell E15620 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Toomer v. Witsell | Statement: [Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana, relatedCase, Toomer v. Witsell]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Toomer v. Witsell
Context triple: [Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana, relatedCase, Toomer v. Witsell]
  • A. Toomer v. Witsell chosen
    Toomer v. Witsell is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly interpreted the Privileges and Immunities Clause by striking down discriminatory state licensing fees imposed on out-of-state commercial fishermen.
  • B. Briggs v. Elliott
    Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
  • C. Bolling v. Sharpe
    Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
  • D. Ware v. Hylton
    Ware v. Hylton was a 1796 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal treaties override conflicting state laws, helping to establish the authority of the national government under the Constitution.
  • E. Sweatt v. Painter
    Sweatt v. Painter was a landmark 1950 U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged racial segregation in higher education and helped lay the groundwork for Brown v. Board of Education.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49358aa308190adbc9b5a0a2adcf9 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a5f3b6388190b5ca3fa31416b61a completed March 1, 2026, 8:47 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a65e3df8e48190905f89acbf7f3667 completed March 3, 2026, 4:06 a.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.