Triple
T739938
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Corfield v. Coryell |
E15220
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasFullCitation |
P17212
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Corfield v. Coryell, 6 F. Cas. 546 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1823) |
E15220
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Corfield v. Coryell, 6 F. Cas. 546 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1823) | Statement: [Corfield v. Coryell, hasFullCitation, Corfield v. Coryell, 6 F. Cas. 546 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1823)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Corfield v. Coryell, 6 F. Cas. 546 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1823) Context triple: [Corfield v. Coryell, hasFullCitation, Corfield v. Coryell, 6 F. Cas. 546 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1823)]
-
A.
Corfield v. Coryell
chosen
Corfield v. Coryell is an 1823 federal circuit court decision by Justice Bushrod Washington that famously articulated an influential early list of the fundamental rights protected by the U.S. Constitution’s Privileges and Immunities Clause.
-
B.
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that Philadelphia violated a Catholic foster care agency’s religious freedom by excluding it from the foster program over its refusal to certify same-sex couples.
-
C.
Frohwerk v. United States
Frohwerk v. United States is a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld a conviction for antiwar newspaper articles, reinforcing broad federal power to punish speech deemed obstructive to World War I military recruitment.
-
D.
Grovey v. Townsend
Grovey v. Townsend was a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the Texas Democratic Party’s whites-only primary rule, later repudiated as unconstitutional racial discrimination in voting.
-
E.
Murdock v. Pennsylvania
Murdock v. Pennsylvania is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that held it unconstitutional to impose a license tax on the distribution of religious literature, reinforcing First Amendment protections for religious proselytizing.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49358aa308190adbc9b5a0a2adcf9 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a5f3b6388190b5ca3fa31416b61a |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:47 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a64a63f9288190b86e4a75467acce0 |
completed | March 3, 2026, 2:41 a.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.