Triple

T7397455
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Scopes v. State E170656 entity
Predicate reasonForReversal P76351 FINISHED
Object improper jury sentencing of fine LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: improper jury sentencing of fine | Statement: [Scopes v. State, reasonForReversal, improper jury sentencing of fine]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reasonForReversal
Context triple: [Scopes v. State, reasonForReversal, improper jury sentencing of fine]
  • A. reasonForReturn
    Indicates the reason or cause why an item, product, or entity is being sent back or returned.
  • B. reasonForAnnulment
    Indicates the specific cause or grounds on which a prior decision, agreement, or status is formally annulled or declared invalid.
  • C. cancellationReason
    Indicates the reason or cause for which a previously scheduled or planned action, event, or agreement was canceled.
  • D. reasonForDecline
    Indicates the explanation or cause given for why something was rejected, reduced, or not accepted.
  • E. reasonForDismissal
    Indicates the cause or justification for which an entity (such as a person, case, or item) was dismissed, terminated, or removed.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68a5f04188190ac266569c9280347 completed March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f24abcd08190b8428fa22b2fbd4f completed March 27, 2026, 9:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6f0309cc88190b55d278969400294 completed March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6f0be2b1c8190bea06100a7caef2b completed March 27, 2026, 9:03 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:09 p.m.