Triple

T7397440
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Scopes v. State E170656 entity
Predicate shortName P43 FINISHED
Object Scopes v. State E170656 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Scopes v. State | Statement: [Scopes v. State, shortName, Scopes v. State]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Scopes v. State
Context triple: [Scopes v. State, shortName, Scopes v. State]
  • A. Scopes v. State chosen
    Scopes v. State was the 1927 Tennessee Supreme Court decision in the famous “Scopes Monkey Trial,” which tested the legality of teaching evolution in public schools and highlighted the clash between modern science and religious fundamentalism.
  • B. Brandenburg v. Ohio
    Brandenburg v. Ohio is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly strengthened free speech protections by establishing the "imminent lawless action" test for when advocacy of violence can be punished under the First Amendment.
  • C. Jacobellis v. Ohio
    Jacobellis v. Ohio is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the constitutional standards for obscenity under the First Amendment, famously associated with Justice Potter Stewart’s “I know it when I see it” concurrence.
  • D. Timbs v. Indiana
    Timbs v. Indiana is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • E. De Jonge v. Oregon
    De Jonge v. Oregon is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the right to peaceful assembly is a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and thus applies to the states.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68a5f04188190ac266569c9280347 completed March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f24abcd08190b8428fa22b2fbd4f completed March 27, 2026, 9:10 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c81101dd448190bcf221f7625c9d34 completed March 28, 2026, 5:33 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:09 p.m.