Triple

T739701
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject von Neumann paradox in set theory E15214 entity
Predicate logicalStatus P16106 FINISHED
Object consistent with Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory plus the axiom of choice (ZFC) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: consistent with Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory plus the axiom of choice (ZFC) | Statement: [von Neumann paradox in set theory, logicalStatus, consistent with Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory plus the axiom of choice (ZFC)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: logicalStatus
Context triple: [von Neumann paradox in set theory, logicalStatus, consistent with Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory plus the axiom of choice (ZFC)]
  • A. statusInLogic chosen
    Indicates the logical status or role an entity holds within a formal reasoning or inference context.
  • B. statusIndicates
    Indicates that a particular status value conveys or reflects the current condition, state, or situation of an entity or process.
  • C. status
    Indicates the current condition, state, or standing of an entity within a given context.
  • D. laterStatus
    Indicates that one entity represents a subsequent or resulting status or condition of another entity in time.
  • E. canonicalStatus
    Indicates the formal or official standing of an entity within an established authoritative or normative system.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49358aa308190adbc9b5a0a2adcf9 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a64adf2c81908e48090be35dd9d9 completed March 1, 2026, 8:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4a4fc734c81908fbd36386d5746d6 completed March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.