Triple
T7391138
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | History of England |
E170498
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalMethodEmphasis |
P9744
|
FINISHED |
| Object | primary sources |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: primary sources | Statement: [History of England, historicalMethodEmphasis, primary sources]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalMethodEmphasis Context triple: [History of England, historicalMethodEmphasis, primary sources]
-
A.
historicalMethod
chosen
Indicates that a particular method, approach, or technique was used in the past, typically in a historical context or during a previous period of activity.
-
B.
historicallyEmphasized
Indicates that one entity has placed notable focus, priority, or importance on another entity or concept over a historical period.
-
C.
historicalFocus
Indicates that something is primarily concerned with, centered on, or devoted to a particular historical period, event, or theme.
-
D.
historicalPractice
Indicates that an action, behavior, or relationship occurred as a customary or established practice during a past historical period.
-
E.
historicallyConsidered
Indicates that one entity has been regarded or classified in a particular way relative to another entity during a past historical period.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68a5e2c9081909e713ce866e0060a |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f22318108190a4dde257fe9e947f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f0309cc88190b55d278969400294 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:09 p.m.