Triple
T7388085
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | HardCopy |
E170431
|
entity |
| Predicate | designFlow |
P29656
|
FINISHED |
| Object | FPGA-to-structured-ASIC migration flow |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: FPGA-to-structured-ASIC migration flow | Statement: [HardCopy, designFlow, FPGA-to-structured-ASIC migration flow]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designFlow Context triple: [HardCopy, designFlow, FPGA-to-structured-ASIC migration flow]
-
A.
designProcess
chosen
Indicates the sequence of actions, decisions, and iterations involved in creating, developing, or refining a design.
-
B.
designLead
Indicates that one entity serves as the primary designer or person in charge of leading the design work for another entity or project.
-
C.
designModel
Indicates that one entity creates, specifies, or defines the structure or behavior of another entity as a model or blueprint.
-
D.
designStatus
Indicates the current state or phase of progress for a design within its lifecycle.
-
E.
designUse
Indicates that one entity is used as a design basis, purpose, or intended functional use for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68a5e2c9081909e713ce866e0060a |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f1f3f5f48190aabe69ba79cbcb93 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f0309cc88190b55d278969400294 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:09 p.m.