Triple
T7386672
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Potters Bar |
E170397
|
entity |
| Predicate | nearbySettlement |
P350
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hatfield |
E211873
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hatfield | Statement: [Potters Bar, nearbySettlement, Hatfield]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hatfield Context triple: [Potters Bar, nearbySettlement, Hatfield]
-
A.
Hatfield
Hatfield is a surname most prominently associated with Mark O. Hatfield, a long-serving U.S. senator and governor from Oregon.
-
B.
Hatfield
chosen
Hatfield is a historic town in Hertfordshire, England, known for Hatfield House and its strong connections to Tudor and Stuart royal history.
-
C.
Carlisle
Carlisle is a historic borough in south-central Pennsylvania known for its military education institutions, colonial heritage, and role in the American Revolutionary era.
-
D.
Carlisle
Carlisle is a historic cathedral city and county town of Cumbria in North West England, near the Scottish border.
-
E.
Winster
Winster is a historic village in England’s Peak District, known for its traditional stone houses, former lead-mining heritage, and well-preserved conservation area.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68a5e2c9081909e713ce866e0060a |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f1f2bac481908ac74069182a4ce4 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:09 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c802e56fb48190976612d2a94d6ee5 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 4:33 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:08 p.m.