Triple

T736626
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Minkowski sum E14947 entity
Predicate isAssociative P19410 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Minkowski sum, isAssociative, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isAssociative
Context triple: [Minkowski sum, isAssociative, true]
  • A. isAssociatedWith
    Indicates that there exists a connection, relationship, or involvement between two entities without specifying its exact nature.
  • B. isPrincipalAssociationOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as the primary or main associated counterpart of another entity within a given context or relationship.
  • C. isAdditiveFor
    Indicates that one entity can be combined with another in a way that their effects or quantities sum together to produce a cumulative result.
  • D. isSymmetric
    Indicates that a relationship holds in both directions between two entities, so if it applies from A to B, it also applies from B to A.
  • E. isHomogeneous
    Indicates that all elements or parts involved share the same type, nature, or characteristics, without significant variation among them.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4934d9930819099eed80096b0597d completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a64adf2c81908e48090be35dd9d9 completed March 1, 2026, 8:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4a4fc734c81908fbd36386d5746d6 completed March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4a64957ec81909fe2e2dbffd80ed3 completed March 1, 2026, 8:49 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.