Triple
T735411
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States–Cuba relations |
E14919
|
entity |
| Predicate | sanctionsType |
P18137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | economic sanctions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: economic sanctions | Statement: [United States–Cuba relations, sanctionsType, economic sanctions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sanctionsType Context triple: [United States–Cuba relations, sanctionsType, economic sanctions]
-
A.
typeOfSanction
chosen
Indicates the specific category or kind of sanction that is applied in a given situation.
-
B.
conditionsLiftingOfSanctionsOn
Indicates that one entity specifies or determines the requirements under which sanctions imposed on another entity will be removed or relaxed.
-
C.
capitalControlsImposed
Indicates that restrictions or regulations have been put in place to limit or manage the flow of capital or financial transactions across borders.
-
D.
isLinkedEconomicallyTo
Indicates that two entities are connected through economic relationships such as trade, investment, financial flows, or shared market dependencies.
-
E.
capitalControlsContext
Indicates the regulatory or policy environment governing restrictions and management of capital flows or financial transactions in a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4934d9930819099eed80096b0597d |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a66820548190b373deb117187c2c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4a4fafee081909bf356854c09aaff |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.