Triple

T735041
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States politics E14910 entity
Predicate dominantPartySystem P19538 FINISHED
Object two-party system LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: two-party system | Statement: [United States politics, dominantPartySystem, two-party system]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dominantPartySystem
Context triple: [United States politics, dominantPartySystem, two-party system]
  • A. dominantParty
    Indicates that one party in a relationship holds primary control, authority, or influence over the other.
  • B. otherMajorParty
    Indicates that an entity is affiliated with a major political party other than a specified primary or reference party.
  • C. politicalParty
    Indicates that an entity is affiliated with, belongs to, or is a member of a specific political party.
  • D. historicalDominantParties
    Indicates that certain political parties have historically held dominant or ruling positions within a given political system or jurisdiction.
  • E. politicalPartyOfGovernment
    Indicates that a specified political party is the one currently forming or leading the government of a given jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4934d9930819099eed80096b0597d completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a66820548190b373deb117187c2c completed March 1, 2026, 8:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4a4fafee081909bf356854c09aaff completed March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4a66658948190bdae6e521951954f completed March 1, 2026, 8:49 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.