Triple

T7348952
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article IV Section 3 Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution E169444 entity
Predicate usedInCase P13176 FINISHED
Object Camfield v. United States E262094 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Camfield v. United States | Statement: [Article IV Section 3 Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, usedInCase, Camfield v. United States]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Camfield v. United States
Context triple: [Article IV Section 3 Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, usedInCase, Camfield v. United States]
  • A. Camfield v. United States chosen
    Camfield v. United States is an 1897 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority under the Property Clause to regulate the use of privately owned lands when necessary to protect adjacent public lands.
  • B. Ocampo v. United States
    Ocampo v. United States is a 1914 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied and developed the Insular Cases framework governing constitutional rights in unincorporated American territories.
  • C. Yates v. United States
    Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
  • D. Reynolds v. United States
    Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
  • E. Abrams v. United States
    Abrams v. United States was a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of antiwar activists under federal law and is best known for Justice Holmes’s famous dissent articulating the “marketplace of ideas” concept in free speech jurisprudence.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68a5878888190968ce4d04db8d69f completed March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f0f269548190abdad3be6856ae8a completed March 27, 2026, 9:04 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c7fa95b26481909f26389d1019da91 completed March 28, 2026, 3:58 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:05 p.m.