Triple

T7348108
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ghawth E169427 entity
Predicate ontologicalStatusInDoctrine P76737 FINISHED
Object createdServantOfGod LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: createdServantOfGod | Statement: [Ghawth, ontologicalStatusInDoctrine, createdServantOfGod]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ontologicalStatusInDoctrine
Context triple: [Ghawth, ontologicalStatusInDoctrine, createdServantOfGod]
  • A. doctrinalStatus
    Indicates the formal standing or classification of a belief, teaching, or doctrine within a particular religious or ideological system.
  • B. ontologicalAspect
    Indicates a fundamental mode or category of being that characterizes how something exists or is realized.
  • C. ontologyStatus
    Indicates the current state or condition of an entity within an ontology lifecycle (e.g., proposed, active, deprecated, or obsolete).
  • D. doctrinalStance
    Indicates the specific set of doctrines, beliefs, or official teachings that an entity adheres to or promotes.
  • E. philosophicalStatus
    Indicates the philosophical position, stance, or classification attributed to an entity within a given conceptual or theoretical framework.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68a5878888190968ce4d04db8d69f completed March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f139505c8190a7158cf59a6e089e completed March 27, 2026, 9:06 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6f02aeeb8819099d1626566cec18b completed March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6f1379cac81908b35e617c44c7b13 completed March 27, 2026, 9:05 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:05 p.m.