Triple
T7344910
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Celebic branch of Austronesian |
E169351
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLanguage |
P15
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pamona language |
E143600
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pamona language | Statement: [Celebic branch of Austronesian, hasLanguage, Pamona language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pamona language Context triple: [Celebic branch of Austronesian, hasLanguage, Pamona language]
-
A.
Pamona language
chosen
The Pamona language is an Austronesian language spoken by the Pamona people of central Sulawesi, Indonesia.
-
B.
Patamona language
The Patamona language is an indigenous Cariban language spoken by the Patamona people of the Guiana Highlands in Guyana and northern Brazil.
-
C.
Picene language
The Picene language is an extinct Italic language once spoken by the ancient Piceni people in east-central Italy.
-
D.
Hoanya language
The Hoanya language is an extinct Austronesian language once spoken by the Hoanya people of western Taiwan and classified among the indigenous Formosan languages.
-
E.
Patelia language
The Patelia language is a regional Indo-Aryan tribal language variety associated with the Bhil communities of western India.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68a57710481909f0c1f3c6ebdb6f2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f0eeb30081909d25704ac9b49d0e |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:04 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c7fa8de0888190b62101471048b8e1 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 3:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:05 p.m.