Triple
T7344517
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Garhwali |
E169341
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAlternativeName |
P39
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gadhwali |
E169341
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gadhwali | Statement: [Garhwali, hasAlternativeName, Gadhwali]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gadhwali Context triple: [Garhwali, hasAlternativeName, Gadhwali]
-
A.
Nagara Bhumija
Nagara Bhumija is a distinctive sub-style of North Indian Hindu temple architecture characterized by a tall, curvilinear main tower surrounded by miniature spires arranged in a regular, grid-like pattern.
-
B.
Garhwali
chosen
Garhwali is an Indo-Aryan language spoken primarily in the Garhwal region of the Indian state of Uttarakhand.
-
C.
Madhesi
Madhesi are an ethnolinguistic group from the southern plains of Nepal, culturally and linguistically close to communities across the border in northern India.
-
D.
Bhutia
Bhutia is a Sino-Tibetan language spoken primarily by the Bhutia community in the Himalayan regions of India, especially in Sikkim and parts of West Bengal.
-
E.
Lepcha
Lepcha is a Tibeto-Burman language spoken by the indigenous Lepcha people of the eastern Himalayas, particularly in and around Sikkim.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68a57710481909f0c1f3c6ebdb6f2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f0ed78908190a169f094cb3f62f0 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:04 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c7fa8de0888190b62101471048b8e1 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 3:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:05 p.m.