Triple

T7338631
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject PSL(2,ℤ) E169191 entity
Predicate hasAbelianization P77186 FINISHED
Object C₆ LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: C₆ | Statement: [PSL(2,ℤ), hasAbelianization, C₆]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAbelianization
Context triple: [PSL(2,ℤ), hasAbelianization, C₆]
  • A. isNonAbelian
    Indicates that the operation or structure in question does not satisfy commutativity, so the order of applying the operation matters.
  • B. hasAdditiveGroupIsomorphicTo
    Indicates that the additive group structure of one algebraic object is isomorphic (structure-preserving bijection exists) to the additive group structure of another.
  • C. hasGaloisGroup
    Indicates that one mathematical object (typically a field extension or polynomial) has the specified group as its Galois group, capturing the symmetries of its roots or structure.
  • D. hasGaloisGroupIsomorphicTo
    Indicates that the Galois group associated with one mathematical object is isomorphic (structure-preserving bijection exists) to the Galois group associated with another object.
  • E. hasNormalSubgroup
    Indicates that one group is a normal subgroup of another group, meaning it is invariant under conjugation by elements of the larger group.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68a57710481909f0c1f3c6ebdb6f2 completed March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f347f25081908e6086d4073295f5 completed March 27, 2026, 9:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6f028fd748190b2ea5c3081958a42 completed March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6f3463d0481908aed9ed43a8ac6a8 completed March 27, 2026, 9:14 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:04 p.m.