Triple

T7337340
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Investment Law No. 43 of 1974 E169160 entity
Predicate typeOfGuarantees P77116 FINISHED
Object protection against arbitrary seizure of assets LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: protection against arbitrary seizure of assets | Statement: [Investment Law No. 43 of 1974, typeOfGuarantees, protection against arbitrary seizure of assets]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfGuarantees
Context triple: [Investment Law No. 43 of 1974, typeOfGuarantees, protection against arbitrary seizure of assets]
  • A. guaranteeCoverage
    Indicates that one party commits to providing financial or protective coverage for another party or specified situation.
  • B. warrantyType
    Indicates the specific category or kind of warranty associated with a product, service, or agreement.
  • C. securityGuarantee
    Indicates a commitment by one party to protect or defend another party against specified threats or risks.
  • D. guaranteeStatus
    Indicates the current state or condition of a guarantee associated with an entity or agreement.
  • E. guaranteedFor
    Indicates that one entity provides an assurance or warranty that remains valid for another entity over a specified period or under certain conditions.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68a568a6481908f11e20db7bc8446 completed March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f347f25081908e6086d4073295f5 completed March 27, 2026, 9:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6f028fd748190b2ea5c3081958a42 completed March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6f3463d0481908aed9ed43a8ac6a8 completed March 27, 2026, 9:14 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:04 p.m.