Triple
T7328084
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Opening |
E168923
|
entity |
| Predicate | statusInPrayer |
P75359
|
FINISHED |
| Object | essential component of Salah |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: essential component of Salah | Statement: [The Opening, statusInPrayer, essential component of Salah]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusInPrayer Context triple: [The Opening, statusInPrayer, essential component of Salah]
-
A.
canBePrayed
Indicates that an entity is a suitable or valid target for prayer or religious supplication.
-
B.
praysAt
Indicates that one entity performs an act of prayer at, or directed toward, a specific place or site.
-
C.
regardsPrayerAs
Indicates that one entity holds a particular attitude, evaluation, or characterization toward prayer as a practice or concept.
-
D.
isAddressedInPrayer
Indicates that an entity is the recipient or target of a prayer being spoken or offered.
-
E.
statusInChristianity
Indicates the recognized role, standing, or significance that something or someone holds within Christian belief, practice, or tradition.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68a54cacc81908e3b773441f19566 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f0a879b88190bef0fb6cbae411ff |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e77230048190b2c29ca6b3a65b8e |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:24 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6e80ae5688190ac3d6c1bdf9532f0 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:26 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:03 p.m.