Triple
T7317749
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Salih |
E168456
|
entity |
| Predicate | threatenedPunishmentFor |
P3012
|
FINISHED |
| Object | harming the she-camel |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: harming the she-camel | Statement: [Salih, threatenedPunishmentFor, harming the she-camel]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: threatenedPunishmentFor Context triple: [Salih, threatenedPunishmentFor, harming the she-camel]
-
A.
punishedBy
Indicates that an entity receives punishment administered by another entity.
-
B.
hasPunishment
chosen
Indicates that an entity is subject to a specified penalty, sanction, or adverse consequence as a result of some action, condition, or rule.
-
C.
aimOfPunishment
Indicates that a specified purpose or objective is the intended goal or rationale behind a particular act of punishment.
-
D.
reasonForPunishment
Indicates that one entity is the cause, justification, or grounds for another entity receiving a punishment.
-
E.
penaltyProvision
Indicates that a rule, contract, or law includes a clause specifying a punishment or sanction for non-compliance or violation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68a5251508190ad68df4151cfeb04 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6ef178b3081908cd0c62466069741 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e7705f4881909793071dee50c557 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:24 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:02 p.m.