Triple
T7311946
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Australian constitutional monarchy |
E168110
|
entity |
| Predicate | successionLawModifiedBy |
P545
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Australian legislation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Australian legislation | Statement: [Australian constitutional monarchy, successionLawModifiedBy, Australian legislation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: successionLawModifiedBy Context triple: [Australian constitutional monarchy, successionLawModifiedBy, Australian legislation]
-
A.
successionLawStatus
Indicates the legal status or condition governing how succession or inheritance is determined or applied.
-
B.
successionRight
Indicates the legal or customary entitlement of one entity to inherit, assume, or take over the position, property, or role of another.
-
C.
successionBasis
Indicates the legal or customary basis on which one entity succeeds or takes over from another in a position, role, or title.
-
D.
successionDefinedBy
chosen
Indicates that the rules, order, or conditions of succession for one entity are determined or specified by another entity.
-
E.
predecessorLawModified
Indicates that a law has been modified by a subsequent law that directly follows it in the legislative sequence.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6888d8e3c81909db79714903baf31 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6ec00fef081909cb9768a70cabd80 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e7705f4881909793071dee50c557 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:24 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:02 p.m.