Triple
T7297949
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Colton Hall |
E164570
|
entity |
| Predicate | CaliforniaConstitutionDraftedHere |
P76071
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1849 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1849 | Statement: [Colton Hall, CaliforniaConstitutionDraftedHere, 1849]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: CaliforniaConstitutionDraftedHere Context triple: [Colton Hall, CaliforniaConstitutionDraftedHere, 1849]
-
A.
CaliforniaOutcome
Indicates the result, consequence, or final status of something specifically in the context of California.
-
B.
foundingState
Indicates that a state or entity played a primary role in establishing or creating another organization, institution, or political entity.
-
C.
stateFounded
Indicates that a particular state was established or created at a specific time or by a specific founding event or agent.
-
D.
constitutionalDocumentPromulgatedBy
Indicates that a constitutional document was formally issued, enacted, or proclaimed by a particular authority or entity.
-
E.
identifiesCorrectConstitution
Indicates that an entity correctly determines, selects, or recognizes the appropriate constitution in a given context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6887a499881909dd23341399c59d8 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6eb8f83c881909e8eae85410f9659 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e76e67d88190bd3ca6864f45845a |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:24 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6eb2d4c0c8190b4cc6fdfdb7f4827 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:40 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3 p.m.