Triple
T7297665
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ad astra per aspera |
E164564
|
entity |
| Predicate | grammaticalNumberOfAstra |
P11612
|
FINISHED |
| Object | plural |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: plural | Statement: [Ad astra per aspera, grammaticalNumberOfAstra, plural]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: grammaticalNumberOfAstra Context triple: [Ad astra per aspera, grammaticalNumberOfAstra, plural]
-
A.
hasGrammaticalNumber
chosen
Indicates that an expression is associated with a specific grammatical number category (such as singular, plural, or dual) in a language.
-
B.
numberOfGrammaticalCases
Indicates the relationship that specifies how many distinct grammatical cases a language or linguistic system possesses.
-
C.
ordinalNumber
Indicates the position or rank of an entity within an ordered sequence (e.g., first, second, third).
-
D.
grammaticalForm
Indicates the specific grammatical structure or morphological form that an expression or word takes in a given linguistic context.
-
E.
grammaticalStructure
Indicates the way linguistic elements are organized and related within a sentence or phrase according to grammatical rules.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6887a499881909dd23341399c59d8 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6eb8f83c881909e8eae85410f9659 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e76e67d88190bd3ca6864f45845a |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:24 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3 p.m.