Triple
T7276327
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tswa–Ronga languages |
E163038
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tsonga language |
E135269
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tsonga language | Statement: [Tswa–Ronga languages, hasPart, Tsonga language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tsonga language Context triple: [Tswa–Ronga languages, hasPart, Tsonga language]
-
A.
Tsonga language
chosen
The Tsonga language is a Bantu language spoken primarily in southern Africa, especially in Mozambique, South Africa, Eswatini, and Zimbabwe.
-
B.
Sanglechi language
The Sanglechi language is an Eastern Iranian language spoken by a small community in the Sanglech Valley region of Afghanistan and Tajikistan.
-
C.
Tontemboan language
The Tontemboan language is an Austronesian language spoken by the Tontemboan people of North Sulawesi, Indonesia, and is one of the traditional Minahasan languages of the region.
-
D.
Kalanga language
The Kalanga language is a Bantu language spoken primarily by the Kalanga people in parts of Botswana and southwestern Zimbabwe.
-
E.
Chambeali language
Chambeali is an Indo-Aryan language spoken in the Chamba region of Himachal Pradesh in northern India.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6885c5964819085b209701769877f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6eb2f239c819097c1ac4d6de8b0e5 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:40 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c7db2c76fc81909632c7ee4e54f81c |
completed | March 28, 2026, 1:44 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:59 p.m.