Triple
T7265616
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mallard |
E159765
|
entity |
| Predicate | numberInPreservation |
P76031
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 4468 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 4468 | Statement: [Mallard, numberInPreservation, 4468]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: numberInPreservation Context triple: [Mallard, numberInPreservation, 4468]
-
A.
stateOfPreservation
Indicates the condition or degree to which something has been maintained, conserved, or kept intact over time.
-
B.
preservationFactor
Indicates the degree to which something is protected, maintained, or kept intact over time, often moderating how much change, loss, or degradation occurs.
-
C.
hasSubjectOfPreservation
Indicates that something is the specific focus or object being preserved or conserved within a preservation relationship.
-
D.
preservationType
Indicates the method or process by which something is preserved or kept from deterioration.
-
E.
selectedForPreservationBy
Indicates that one entity has been chosen by another entity to be kept, maintained, or safeguarded from removal or loss.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68838f9948190875fd60b2351230c |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6eb088dac8190b353f6ea3d686025 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e76876608190ac4652bc7153302e |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:24 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6eb06acd881908a1735fbbbd5756f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:39 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:57 p.m.