Triple

T7265225
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tyne–Wear derby E159753 entity
Predicate notableIncidentType P76024 FINISHED
Object crowd trouble LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: crowd trouble | Statement: [Tyne–Wear derby, notableIncidentType, crowd trouble]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableIncidentType
Context triple: [Tyne–Wear derby, notableIncidentType, crowd trouble]
  • A. notableProtectiveIncident
    Indicates that a significant event occurred in which one entity protected or defended another in a notable or remarkable way.
  • B. notableViolentCase
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific case or incident that is recognized as involving significant or noteworthy violence.
  • C. notableVictim
    Indicates that the subject is a person or entity who is notably recognized as a victim of the object (such as an event, crime, or harmful action).
  • D. notableDisasterType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of disaster for which something (such as a place, event, or entity) is notable or best known.
  • E. notableEncounterWith
    Indicates that an entity has had a significant or noteworthy meeting, interaction, or confrontation with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68838f9948190875fd60b2351230c completed March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6eb088dac8190b353f6ea3d686025 completed March 27, 2026, 8:39 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6e76876608190ac4652bc7153302e completed March 27, 2026, 8:24 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6eb06acd881908a1735fbbbd5756f completed March 27, 2026, 8:39 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:57 p.m.