Triple

T7264293
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ga–Dangme languages E159731 entity
Predicate iso6395Code P19023 FINISHED
Object gaa LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: gaa | Statement: [Ga–Dangme languages, iso6395Code, gaa]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: iso6395Code
Context triple: [Ga–Dangme languages, iso6395Code, gaa]
  • A. hasISO639_5Code chosen
    Indicates that a language or language group is associated with a specific ISO 639-5 code that identifies it within the ISO 639-5 language classification standard.
  • B. languageCodeISO639-2
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a language identified by its ISO 639-2 three-letter code.
  • C. ISO639-6Code
    Indicates the standardized ISO 639-6 four-letter code that uniquely identifies a specific language variety or dialect.
  • D. ISO639-3CodeOfLanguage
    Indicates that one entity is the ISO 639-3 three-letter language code assigned to the language represented by the other entity.
  • E. ISO639CollectiveCode
    Indicates that the relationship assigns or associates an ISO 639 collective language code (a code representing a group of related languages) to the relevant language entity or set of languages.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68838f9948190875fd60b2351230c completed March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6eb088dac8190b353f6ea3d686025 completed March 27, 2026, 8:39 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6e76876608190ac4652bc7153302e completed March 27, 2026, 8:24 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:57 p.m.