Triple

T7255258
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Homma trial E157701 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object In re Homma
In re Homma is a legal case that arose from and is closely associated with the Homma trial, addressing related judicial issues stemming from that proceeding.
E157701 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: In re Homma | Statement: [Homma trial, relatedCase, In re Homma]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: In re Homma
Context triple: [Homma trial, relatedCase, In re Homma]
  • A. Homma trial
    The Homma trial was a post–World War II U.S. military tribunal that prosecuted Japanese General Masaharu Homma for war crimes committed by his forces against American and Filipino prisoners in the Philippines.
  • B. Ex parte Endo
    Ex parte Endo is a landmark 1944 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the government could not continue to detain a loyal American citizen of Japanese ancestry in a World War II internment camp.
  • C. Yamashita v. Styer
    Yamashita v. Styer is a landmark 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of Japanese General Tomoyuki Yamashita and established the controversial "command responsibility" doctrine in international law.
  • D. Ex parte Siebold
    Ex parte Siebold is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal authority to regulate and enforce laws governing federal elections, affirming broad congressional power over the electoral process.
  • E. Hiroshima High Court
    The Hiroshima High Court is one of Japan’s regional high courts, serving as an appellate court that reviews decisions from lower courts within its jurisdiction in western Japan.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: In re Homma
Triple: [Homma trial, relatedCase, In re Homma]
Generated description
In re Homma is a legal case that arose from and is closely associated with the Homma trial, addressing related judicial issues stemming from that proceeding.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: In re Homma
Target entity description: In re Homma is a legal case that arose from and is closely associated with the Homma trial, addressing related judicial issues stemming from that proceeding.
  • A. Homma trial chosen
    The Homma trial was a post–World War II U.S. military tribunal that prosecuted Japanese General Masaharu Homma for war crimes committed by his forces against American and Filipino prisoners in the Philippines.
  • B. Ex parte Endo
    Ex parte Endo is a landmark 1944 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the government could not continue to detain a loyal American citizen of Japanese ancestry in a World War II internment camp.
  • C. Yamashita v. Styer
    Yamashita v. Styer is a landmark 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of Japanese General Tomoyuki Yamashita and established the controversial "command responsibility" doctrine in international law.
  • D. Ex parte Siebold
    Ex parte Siebold is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal authority to regulate and enforce laws governing federal elections, affirming broad congressional power over the electoral process.
  • E. Hiroshima High Court
    The Hiroshima High Court is one of Japan’s regional high courts, serving as an appellate court that reviews decisions from lower courts within its jurisdiction in western Japan.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6882d81d4819085f7ff862951ee4f completed March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6eaa0c76c81909fe43ed6938a13ea completed March 27, 2026, 8:37 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c7d3b053248190802b11212a8a668f completed March 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69c7d44e67848190ac52eca99ef18f28 completed March 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69c7d4fc837c81909827352be19f64b4 completed March 28, 2026, 1:17 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:56 p.m.