Triple
T7255258
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Homma trial |
E157701
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
In re Homma
In re Homma is a legal case that arose from and is closely associated with the Homma trial, addressing related judicial issues stemming from that proceeding.
|
E157701
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: In re Homma | Statement: [Homma trial, relatedCase, In re Homma]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: In re Homma Context triple: [Homma trial, relatedCase, In re Homma]
-
A.
Homma trial
The Homma trial was a post–World War II U.S. military tribunal that prosecuted Japanese General Masaharu Homma for war crimes committed by his forces against American and Filipino prisoners in the Philippines.
-
B.
Ex parte Endo
Ex parte Endo is a landmark 1944 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the government could not continue to detain a loyal American citizen of Japanese ancestry in a World War II internment camp.
-
C.
Yamashita v. Styer
Yamashita v. Styer is a landmark 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of Japanese General Tomoyuki Yamashita and established the controversial "command responsibility" doctrine in international law.
-
D.
Ex parte Siebold
Ex parte Siebold is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal authority to regulate and enforce laws governing federal elections, affirming broad congressional power over the electoral process.
-
E.
Hiroshima High Court
The Hiroshima High Court is one of Japan’s regional high courts, serving as an appellate court that reviews decisions from lower courts within its jurisdiction in western Japan.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: In re Homma Triple: [Homma trial, relatedCase, In re Homma]
Generated description
In re Homma is a legal case that arose from and is closely associated with the Homma trial, addressing related judicial issues stemming from that proceeding.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: In re Homma Target entity description: In re Homma is a legal case that arose from and is closely associated with the Homma trial, addressing related judicial issues stemming from that proceeding.
-
A.
Homma trial
chosen
The Homma trial was a post–World War II U.S. military tribunal that prosecuted Japanese General Masaharu Homma for war crimes committed by his forces against American and Filipino prisoners in the Philippines.
-
B.
Ex parte Endo
Ex parte Endo is a landmark 1944 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the government could not continue to detain a loyal American citizen of Japanese ancestry in a World War II internment camp.
-
C.
Yamashita v. Styer
Yamashita v. Styer is a landmark 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of Japanese General Tomoyuki Yamashita and established the controversial "command responsibility" doctrine in international law.
-
D.
Ex parte Siebold
Ex parte Siebold is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal authority to regulate and enforce laws governing federal elections, affirming broad congressional power over the electoral process.
-
E.
Hiroshima High Court
The Hiroshima High Court is one of Japan’s regional high courts, serving as an appellate court that reviews decisions from lower courts within its jurisdiction in western Japan.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6882d81d4819085f7ff862951ee4f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6eaa0c76c81909fe43ed6938a13ea |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:37 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c7d3b053248190802b11212a8a668f |
completed | March 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69c7d44e67848190ac52eca99ef18f28 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69c7d4fc837c81909827352be19f64b4 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 1:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:56 p.m.