Triple

T7240192
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Walker County, Alabama E155333 entity
Predicate hasCity P316 FINISHED
Object Carbon Hill, Alabama E180156 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Carbon Hill, Alabama | Statement: [Walker County, Alabama, hasCity, Carbon Hill, Alabama]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Carbon Hill, Alabama
Context triple: [Walker County, Alabama, hasCity, Carbon Hill, Alabama]
  • A. Carbon Hill, Alabama chosen
    Carbon Hill is a small city in northwestern Alabama known historically as a coal-mining community within Walker County.
  • B. Steele, Alabama
    Steele, Alabama is a small town in northeastern Alabama known for its rural character and location within St. Clair County.
  • C. Helena, Alabama
    Helena, Alabama is a suburban city in central Alabama known for its family-friendly neighborhoods, strong schools, and proximity to Birmingham.
  • D. Plantersville, Alabama
    Plantersville, Alabama is a small unincorporated rural community in central Alabama known for its historic character and agricultural surroundings.
  • E. Slocomb, Alabama
    Slocomb, Alabama is a small city in southeastern Alabama known for its agricultural roots and annual "Tomato Festival."
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c688143bfc81908d4176617735e601 completed March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6ea39230481908401ead83d8666cd completed March 27, 2026, 8:36 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c7cc3d75b48190916bf327396f2666 completed March 28, 2026, 12:40 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:55 p.m.