Triple
T7236248
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Russell Pearce |
E155233
|
entity |
| Predicate | sponsored |
P1807
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Arizona SB 1070 |
E140034
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arizona SB 1070 | Statement: [Russell Pearce, sponsored, Arizona SB 1070]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Arizona SB 1070 Context triple: [Russell Pearce, sponsored, Arizona SB 1070]
-
A.
SB 1070
chosen
SB 1070 is a controversial Arizona immigration law enacted in 2010 that sought to empower state and local law enforcement to more aggressively identify and penalize undocumented immigrants.
-
B.
Arizona v. United States
Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
-
C.
Arizona v. Evans
Arizona v. Evans is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained through an arrest based on erroneous computer records.
-
D.
Arizona v. Johnson
Arizona v. Johnson is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified police authority to frisk passengers during lawful traffic stops when officers reasonably suspect they are armed and dangerous.
-
E.
Bucklew v. Precythe
Bucklew v. Precythe is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld Missouri’s method of execution against an Eighth Amendment challenge, clarifying the standards for inmates claiming that a particular execution protocol would cause them severe pain.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c688143bfc81908d4176617735e601 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6ea33dd3481908ebb050e1fab5aaa |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:36 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c7d38b5ac4819083837b149ec9e3ea |
completed | March 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:55 p.m.