Triple
T7231219
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Henry v. Hodges |
E154905
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tanco v. Haslam |
E28842
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tanco v. Haslam | Statement: [Henry v. Hodges, relatedCase, Tanco v. Haslam]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tanco v. Haslam Context triple: [Henry v. Hodges, relatedCase, Tanco v. Haslam]
-
A.
Tanco v. Haslam
chosen
Tanco v. Haslam was a federal court case challenging Tennessee’s refusal to recognize same-sex marriages, which became one of the cases consolidated into the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
-
B.
Tennessee v. Lane
Tennessee v. Lane is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to require states to provide accessible courthouses under the Americans with Disabilities Act as a valid enforcement of the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
C.
Alabama v. Shelton
Alabama v. Shelton is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a suspended sentence that may result in imprisonment cannot be imposed unless the defendant was afforded the right to counsel.
-
D.
DeBoer v. Snyder
DeBoer v. Snyder was a federal court case challenging Michigan’s same-sex marriage ban that became one of the key cases consolidated into the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
-
E.
Crawford v. Washington
Crawford v. Washington is a landmark 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped Confrontation Clause jurisprudence by holding that testimonial hearsay is inadmissible against a criminal defendant unless the witness is unavailable and there was a prior opportunity for cross-examination.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68811dd1c8190ac460bb39e64e1f0 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6ea0f09648190b285993556f704d5 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:35 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c7cc22a39481909a2f38014260f302 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 12:40 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:54 p.m.