Triple
T7229155
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | People of Noah |
E154858
|
entity |
| Predicate | responseToWarning |
P75737
|
FINISHED |
| Object | persistence in sin |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: persistence in sin | Statement: [People of Noah, responseToWarning, persistence in sin]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: responseToWarning Context triple: [People of Noah, responseToWarning, persistence in sin]
-
A.
warningIssued
Indicates that a formal warning or alert has been communicated from one entity to another regarding a potential or existing risk, problem, or violation.
-
B.
warningType
Indicates the specific category or classification of a warning associated with an entity or event.
-
C.
warnsAbout
Indicates that one entity alerts or cautions another entity about a potential danger, risk, or problem.
-
D.
warningRecipient
Indicates that one entity is the recipient or target audience of a warning issued by another entity.
-
E.
warningCall
Indicates that one entity initiates a call to another specifically to warn them about a danger, risk, or important cautionary information.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68811dd1c8190ac460bb39e64e1f0 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e9e0ba248190a57a3b4fa8b858c7 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e761b7fc8190857794d78af1b468 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:24 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6e8b5f6508190af28e06a7959d717 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:54 p.m.