Triple

T7217439
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Badlands E149570 entity
Predicate hasPhilosophicalTone P58526 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Badlands, hasPhilosophicalTone, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPhilosophicalTone
Context triple: [Badlands, hasPhilosophicalTone, true]
  • A. hasPhilosophicalContent chosen
    Indicates that something contains or expresses ideas, themes, or discussions related to philosophy or philosophical inquiry.
  • B. hasPhilosophyAbout
    Indicates that one entity holds, develops, or expresses a philosophical view, theory, or stance concerning another entity or subject.
  • C. hasPhilosophicalRole
    Indicates that an entity occupies, performs, or is associated with a specific role or function within a philosophical context or discourse.
  • D. hasPhilosophicalReputation
    Indicates that an entity is recognized or regarded as having a notable standing, influence, or esteem within the realm of philosophy.
  • E. philosophicalTheme
    Indicates that a work, idea, or discourse centrally involves or explores a particular philosophical concept, question, or line of thought.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c687eca814819095abb52316b1af80 completed March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6e99170d88190b1aef326a7d81134 completed March 27, 2026, 8:33 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6e75f84e481909e7866186ae80cff completed March 27, 2026, 8:23 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:53 p.m.