Triple
T7214719
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mokra, Poland |
E149502
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOf |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kłobuck County |
E690959
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kłobuck County | Statement: [Mokra, Poland, partOf, Kłobuck County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kłobuck County Context triple: [Mokra, Poland, partOf, Kłobuck County]
-
A.
Kłobuck County
chosen
Kłobuck County is an administrative district (powiat) in the Silesian Voivodeship of southern Poland, with the town of Kłobuck as its seat.
-
B.
Zawichost County
Zawichost County was a historical administrative district in the Sandomierz region of Poland, centered on the town of Zawichost.
-
C.
Opatów County
Opatów County is an administrative district in south-central Poland known for its historic town of Opatów and its location within the Świętokrzyskie region.
-
D.
Szydłowiec County
Szydłowiec County is an administrative district (powiat) in the Masovian Voivodeship of east-central Poland, centered around the town of Szydłowiec.
-
E.
Łowicz County
Łowicz County is an administrative district in central Poland’s Łódź Voivodeship, known for its historic towns, traditional folk culture, and agricultural landscape.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c687eca814819095abb52316b1af80 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e98cbebc8190941e76259c988790 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:33 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c963dc62f88190b2aff49f5cb5fe27 |
completed | March 29, 2026, 5:39 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:53 p.m.