Triple
T7204592
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Minersville School District v. Gobitis |
E148632
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDissentType |
P75806
|
FINISHED |
| Object | solo dissent |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: solo dissent | Statement: [Minersville School District v. Gobitis, hasDissentType, solo dissent]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDissentType Context triple: [Minersville School District v. Gobitis, hasDissentType, solo dissent]
-
A.
hasDissentAuthor
Indicates that a decision, opinion, or ruling has an associated author who wrote a dissenting opinion.
-
B.
hasDissentingJustice
Indicates that within a judicial decision or ruling, there exists at least one justice who formally disagrees with the majority opinion.
-
C.
mayDissentOn
Indicates that an entity has the option or permission to formally disagree with or oppose another entity’s decision, opinion, or action.
-
D.
dissentingJustice
Indicates that a particular justice disagrees with the majority opinion or decision in a legal case.
-
E.
standardDiscussedInDissent
Indicates that a particular legal standard is examined or addressed within the dissenting opinion of a judicial decision.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c687e8cf188190b5f3ecffd681f04e |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e94d68ec8190ae3e1280bad12665 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e757fed4819091b0a096e3befc3a |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:23 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6e8fd9b848190b2b1beea5698422b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:52 p.m.